Right to information

Libraries categorize books as "fiction" vs. "non-fiction".

Can we have a Regulation that forces media / news agencies to do the same? Basically make people publish & validate the facts on regular basis. From all our common sources of information on things that matter (newspaper, radio, TV) what we get is someone's view of an event. Sometimes totally contradictory pieces in the same publication...

Take a look at Times of India in recent times....

• Bush blames India and China for the food crisis
• Bush talks about prosperity in India and China (which he says is good!) driving higher demand for food across the world

Two views on the same news. But first one appeared a number of time in the same issue in various sub-sections or suppliments.

So what is the role of a "newspaper"? Does "news" equate with "senstional breaking news" that should only "entertain" or does it also mean that one "gets the facts and can form his own opinion"?

Can there be a way of tying up the "right to information" act with the common sources of information?

Let people vote on what is most important to them and have the government release a "status report" on regular basis AND mandate the top 3 newspapers to give some free space to publish the same....

Dear Indians,

Choose from the following topics that you want to know more about...

• How many movies released last 3 years have the protogonist consume alchohol?
• What are the specific actions the Health Minister has initiatied to expand availability of basic medical facilities across the country? How often does he review the progress?

Make the top 3 dailies & news channels report updates on this on regular basis.

Like a sports page, page 3, editorials, why can't we have a "State of the nation" page?

Deserve before desire

"Deserve before you desire..." I saw this line on a PPT somewhere, later was told that it was by a Sr Executive with huge Indian business house....

Anyway, not here to discuss the source... Focus on the message now. Does anyone believe in this anymore?

In the last 10 years there seems to be a huge increase in "I want it all and I want it now" attitude.

Not everyone has the capabilities to "earn" the buying power for "IWA & IWIN". So, take risks!!! In career, rush thru to the next level of designation without delivering output over a consistent period of time. So at some point we have a many Leaders who lack the in-depth understanding / exposure to the demands of the role, not really reached the skills, experience, emotional maturity & control required to fulfill the requirements... Overall degradation of output / ineffciencies.

In investments, everyone expects more fools to follow after them... Obviously the "investments" themselves (public listed companies) have a pressure of meeting the "growth" targets. So, short term decisions with the street as the only important stakeholder is a norm? Higher revenues / short term "bookings" at the cost of not fulfilling the promises? How many care about building operational efficiencies and delivering value to the customer who has PAID ALREADY? Unless a customer has further "billings" potential, it's a done deal - history. Gotta find new markets, kill the competion, close the deals; revenue recognition. Sell, sell, sell, promise, promise, promise... deliver? ooops. "we will fix it soon - buy the upgrade". More ineffciency added to the world!

Maybe the need of the hour is to discourage "desires" that one has not earned but gurantee a level of living for minimum efforts to prevent social unrest (sounds like communism? don't mean it that way); and reward "efficiency" (not just growth) with "luxaries" in life.... Make it very exclusive!

Turn the concept of government around for a second.... instead of "of the people, by the people, for the people", treat it as a espcialized service which exists to "govern" well. Choose the experts, make them responsible for rewarding "excellence" in governance... Fallout of this is, allow entiites to run the world using competence a yardstick and not number of "supporters" they garnered! Democracy / socialism and meritocracy don't go hand in hand! But that's another subject?